Proofreading Techniques When Time is Tight

Editing Techniques When Time is Tight (Issue 24: November, 2009) What would it be advisable for you to do when you should edited a business record, yet you face a hysterical partner, a requesting chief, or an abbreviated cutoff time? As the Christmas season and end-of-year cutoff times approach, you’ll need to deliver more archives in even less time. Accepting that the terrified individual who presented to you the report gave you no particular guidelines about what to search for and what to overlook, here is a rundown of three procedure checks, arranged by importance:1) Check, Print, Find Reviewer: Work two by two - request that an associate confirmation your archives, and give back in kind. Run the report through syntax and spell-check. This won't find everything, except it will hail mistakes. Print the report. Discovering mistakes in print is a lot simpler than on screen. 2) Check Format and Organization: Check the pagination. Ensure that the pages are numbered successively. In the event that the archive is to be replicated twofold sided, verify that clear pages have been embedded appropriately and that all odd-numbered pages will fall on a right-hand page. Edit the spread page and cover sheet in exactly the same words. Ensure that the date is right and that the organization's and creator's names are spelled accurately. Flip each page and search for any glaring mistakes, for example, missing figures or printer glitches, for example, terribly lopsided page toner. Flip each page once more (make a different pass) and take a gander at the organization to see that headings and subheadings are the right size and typeface, separating and space are steady, running headings are right, and edges are the correct size. Check the list of chapters against the content. Ensure that the entirety of the areas are incorporated and that the wording in the list of chapters coordinates the content. Check the page numbers against the content. On the off chance that you have a PowerPoint archive, you will probably discover mistakes here. Take a gander at the illustrations and tables. Ensure they are numbered effectively and that their titles accurately depict what shows up. #3 Read Most Important Text: Peruse the prelude, official synopsis, or some other initial material that the peruser is probably going to take a gander from the outset. Peruse the end or last rundown segment. Peruse the headings and subheadings. Peruse the main sentence (or first passage, if there is season) of each area. On the off chance that you have whenever remaining, edit realized difficulty spots. You'll see that the initial 2 procedures don't include editing text. In case you're truly crunched for time, check the association and style of the record first on the grounds that: It is quick to do as such. An ineffectively composed archive is amateurish, and promptly clear to a peruser. More regrettable yet, your peruser will be lost in the confusion. You will locate the most clear blunders. Just once you confirm association and appearance (things 1-2), should you move to message audit (thing 3).Ideally, we have to permit enough editing time. Yet, here and there we don't have that choice. These methods will spare you when you're confronted with too brief period.

HNC Counselling. Graded Unit F1M 34 Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

HNC Counseling. Reviewed Unit F1M 34 - Coursework Example (150) The principle issue is Fritz is by all accounts to some degree an underachiever. He is surrendering in light of the fact that his business isn't working out positively, and now it is taking steps to separate his entire family. Moreover, he has correspondence issues with his better half, not so much realizing how to communicate well or offer his emotions about what he needs to do with the business, when he should unmistakably tell her what he is thinkingâ€especially needing to settle on such a major life choice about selling the business and moving out of the city. Anna is on the right track to need to have a separation, as Fritz is being irrational. Further, he isn't paying attention to his child rearing duties, and this is additionally a worry. Fritz, thusly, has three fundamental issues: speaking with Anna, dynamic, and playing a functioning job in the improvement of his childrens’ childhood. He needs take a shot at these issues. Clarification of the hypothesis. (25 0 words) The speculations presented here are humanistic hypothesis and psychodynamic hypothesis, with Egan’s three-phase model as a method of understanding the hypothesis. Humanistic hypothesis is an extremely basic hypothesis which assists individuals with understanding one approach to direct others. â€Å"Many models of gathering work and hierarchical advancement have drawn intensely on humanistic theory† (Strawbridge, Woolfe, and Dryden, 2009, 142). Humanistic hypothesis likewise has another name. ... There are â€Å"†¦verbal and nonverbal practices that improve powerful tuning in and communication† (Rennie, 1998, pp. 32). Psychodynamic instructors notice practices and attempt to adjust these practices into all the more socially adequate responses. Over the span of psychodynamic advising, â€Å"†¦some standards of conduct, and a few sentiments are oblivious [and the customer may not be made mindful of these until they are mentioned]† (Jacobs, 2004, pp. 101). Gerard Egan of Loyola University in Chicago built up a three-phase model, where the guided individual must understand the present (â€Å"Where am I?†), the liked (â€Å"Where would I like to be?†) and techniques for the future (â€Å"How do I get where I need to be?†). â€Å"Egan’s three-phase model can fill in as a helpful and viable guide in directing and a methods for carrying structure to the procedure of counselling† (Burnard, 2005, pp. 127). Fulfillment date and achievements. (65 words) The finish date for Fritz ought to be founded on what he can do in how much time. Maybe he ought to be given a limited date, a couple of months, wherein to fix at any rate two of his problemsâ€the correspondence issue with Ann and his failure to communicate well. The issue with Harry ought to be settled sooner; Fritz ought to be urged to teach him. Moral standards in guiding. (100 words) In directing, it’s significant that the client’s limits are regarded and that, clearly, one would not consider Anna so as to tell her subtleties of the advising meetings except if Fritz permitted it. It would likewise be unseemly to offer child rearing counsel, tips, or reprobations, or in any case disclose to Fritz out and out how to run his life or deal with his marriage. Those activities would be outside the

2.007 Where even your smallest part matters

2.007 Where even your smallest part matters Wow, most exciting/eventful two days ever. Im very sad to say that 2.007 has come to a close. If youre saying, 2.007, huh? click here and read about the contest description on Bryans blog. The four years at MIT are simulated using a table with five levels, including a Freshman, Sophomore, Junior, and Senior platform, where wooden and rubber balls represent credits required for graduation. Being a tech school, the balls representing the engineering classes are three times more valuable than the ones for humanities, and only one graduate ball represents the coveted MIT diploma. Basically, this class was one of the reasons I came to MIT. Most (maybe all) other schools do not have the time and resources to make such a class possible, especially because at MIT it is a required class for all mechanical engineers, and there are a lot of us! Since February, about 150 mechanical engineering students have put their hearts and souls into building robots for this competition. Bryan and I had the pleasure of spending pretty much all day Friday in the lab, along with our regularly scheduled lab time (4 hours once a week) and whenever else we got the chance. The class teaches design and manufacturing, so the first month or so is dedicated to designing the robot (coming up with strategies, concepts, modules), and subsequent months are spent on engineering and building. Its an amazing opportunity to work through the entire design process and end up with a nice final product. Alas, here is my robot: Its name is Melotaur (both a play on words on the Minotaur, the ancient Greek half-bull half-man (meant to be intimidatinggrr), and because its a combination (sort of) of my first and last name.) Melotaur has brought me much happiness and sadness, but mostly happiness. Heres a glimpse of the roller coaster that is robotics: February: Complete frustration because I had no idea which strategy to choose (should I go for the humanities balls? should I make use an arm? ahhh!?) March: Slightly less frustration, but much confusion. I finally decided on a strategy and went with it! April: Things started coming into place. April 27 (I know because its recorded in my journal): Seriously, it was the happiest day of the semester. My robot finally worked for the first time. May 5-morning of May 9: Complete frustration, again, as my motors refused to work. I had to rebulid them a million times, and then finally Mark, an Undergraduate Assistant who won the competition last year, told me just to remove one of the screws that was attaching the motor to my robot and, VOILA, it worked. The motors were just over-constrained. One screw made all the difference. Night of May 9: Seeding for the final competition. Basically, the instructors decide who plays whom in the first round of the competition by having you run your car on the table by itself and seeing how many points you can score. My car did better than it had ever done before, I was able to score 680 points (4 engineering balls and 1 graduate ball in the A bin.) It was so, so, so exciting. It also gave me a really high seed in the competition, which guaranteed that I would play someone who was unable to score in seeding. May 16 (yesterday): Round 1 Check out Bryan and Megan (07) getting ready to kick butt: I was able to score 3 engineering balls in the A bin, giving me a score of 360. So, I advanced to the next days competition, along with Bryan! May 17 (today!): Round of 64 At this point, half of the class is eliminated from the competition. Things get more serious and the judging gets tough. In the first game of the round of 64, I knew that my opponent had a robot that could hypothetically capture all 9 engineering balls and shoot them down from the top platform. My strategy was to go directly for his humanities ball, in the meantime using my robot to block his balls from making it down the ramps. Unfortunately, a combination of a motor problem and a new driving configuration that I had not practiced caused my car to fall off of the ramp. However, the contest was re-run and in the second game I was able to score one engineering ball in the B bin. I could have scored more if some nuts on the side of my robot had not rubbed against the plastic shielding on the table, preventing it from driving straight. I fixed the nut problem by covering the ends with a piece of tape. For the round of 32, my robot was doing splendidly, as I captured 4 engineering balls. However, the spring pin that held the coupling for the wheel shaft came loose and partially fell out, causing it to scrape against the base of the robot. My robot was immobilized on the Junior platform, as it could not turn with a jammed wheel. This was highly unfortunate and could have been avoided by making sure that all of the spring pins were strongly in place. So I was knocked out, I ended up getting 17th overall. But, the winning robots were just so beautiful. Like, impeccably designed and manufactured. Here are pictures from the semifinals: And finally, the final round was between Orian Welling and Greg Schroll. They had very similar robots, in that they both used treads (like an Army tank) and a rotating mechanism to capture and release balls. It was a nailbiter since they were very evenly matched! Click here to see the video of the final round (warning, its a VERY big file.18 MB, but its worth it!) Greg Schroll ended up winning, congrats to him! Both robots were incredibly consistent throughout the entire contest. Everyone was very impressed. What a RIDICULOUSLY AWESOME SCORE by Orian in a previous round: And here is a picture of the top 4 winners! They will all be going to the International Robotics Contest in Japan this summer! You can see Professor Slocum, the main teacher of the class, picking up Greg (the winner.) This is a little tradition of the contest, along with making people do lots of push-ups throughout the competition. Sooo, last but not least, what did I learn? First of all, Id like to thank all of my friends who came to the competition. I could not have done it with your constant support, you all are amazing. When my robot fell off the cliff in the first round of 64, I was devestated, but my amazing friends vouched for me (as in, fought with the judges to let me try again) and comforted me. Bryan even offered for me to take apart his robot to get spare pieces and fix my own! I also learned that design and manufacturing is completely awesome. 2.007 was the most fun class Ive taken at MIT (also the most time consuming) and Ive gotten so much out of it. Theres nothing quite like taking a wild idea on paper and making it a reality. Will write more later after things sink in.